Here is a nice short newspaper article from 1966:
Sharon's Secret
By Earl Wilson
LONDON--Sharon Tate had to keep a secret and the secret was Sharon Tate.
Nobody was to know that Sharon Tate was to be lauched as a secret sex missile. And keeping it a secret wasn't easy for Sharon Tate, because she's an All-American girl not given to secrecy.
When I asked her where she is from in America, she answered, "Everywhere!"
Born in Dallas, as city she remembers but slightly, Sharon naturally went along when her father, an Army Officer, was transferred to ... San Francisco, to the state of Washington, to the city of Washington ... eventually to Verona, Italy. She didn't go along when he went to Vietnam where he's now stationed, a year away from retirement.
"By then, I was already signed and under wraps, as they say," Sharon told me at breakfast at the Savoy.
She'd become one of the beautiful people trying to make it in Hollywood. She'd gone to test for a cigarette commerical, taken one deep puff, and fallen on her face.
"Then they sent me for an interview for a movie part. They said, 'Honey, this is for a girl who's been around. You look like a baby.'
"That afternoon I had to go to Metro for another interview. Marty Ransohoff, the producer, sat in a chair near me. When I came in they just sat and looked at me.
"They said they had a plan for me. They would train me and prepare me.
"I would live quietly and study until I was ready. I would not take any jobs and I would not be seen.
"I studied in New York with Lee Strasberg. I lived at 42nd Street and 2nd Avenue. At times I was wondering if it was really going to happen. But generally I did not have time to have doubts."
Somehow she learned she should remain what she had been ... "to retain those things the producer saw in me the first time he saw me ... I had a job to stay the way I was ...
"The big mistake some girls make is to change themselves into somebody else."
So Sharon kept Sharon's secret. Finally, she was ready. They launched her in 'Thirteen', playing the lead (the star is Deborah Kerr), then gave her stardom of her own in 'The Vampire Killers,' another spoof of vampires.
"I'm a sweet innocent little girl who's stolen by the vampires--out of a bathtub," she explained. "I am a Jewish girl named Sarah.
"I'm taking a bath when they decided to send me to school to make me a lady. My father has decided to keep my room full of garlic to keep people away from finding me. So when they open the door and find me in the bath ... but I mustn't give away the plot ... "
Sounds like to me it might be keeping Sharon Tate in a bathtub... but that's how Paulette Goddard started.
As you know I have been trying to get in touch with various people who knew Sharon. Recently, I came across another name of a girl who knew her. But unfortunately, I found she has since passed. She also dated Sebring and tried to console Polanski after Sharon's death. Her name was Connie Kreski and here is a brief summary of her life:
Connie Kreski (September 19, 1946, Wyandotte, Michigan – March 21, 1995, Beverly Hills, California) was Playboy magazine's Playmate of the Month for January 1968 and was Playmate of the Year for 1969. Kreski had long taffy-colored hair and blue eyes.
In April 1969 Kreski was signed by Newley to play the feminine title role of Mercy Humppe in the Universal Pictures film Can Hieronymus Merkin Ever Forget Mercy Humppe and Find True Happiness? The movie was shot in Malta and starred Milton Berle, Joan Collins, and George Jessel.
Los Angeles Times writer Joyce Haber mentioned Kreski in a newspaper column just days after the murder of Sharon Tate by followers of Charles Manson. Kreski was a member of the murdered actress' social circle along with John Phillips, Michelle Phillips, Tina Sinatra, Jacqueline Bisset, Michael Sarrazin, and Andrew Prine. Kreski was among those invited to the mansion Tate shared with her husband, director Roman Polanski. The home was on Cielo Drive, Los Angeles, California. Haber said that some of those invited declined to attend on the fatal night of August 9, 1969.
Kreski died of a blocked carotid artery on March 21, 1995 in Beverly Hills, California.
---from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connie_Kreski
Here are some photos (from Getty Images) of her with Roman taken in late 1969 or 1970 sometime. Not sure who the men are with them? One looks alike Bill Tenant but not sure about the other? Does anyone know?
And look at this adorable new cartoon art of Sharon and Roman from "The Fearless Vampire Killers" (from Deviant Art):
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Sharon Discusses her Career and FVK, Connie Kresci and Sharon and Roman, and More Adorable Art of Sharon from FVK
Labels:
Andrew Prine,
Connie Kreski,
Earl Wilson,
George Jessel,
Lee Strasberg,
Michael Sarrazin,
Milton Berle,
Paulette Goddard,
Roman Polanski,
sharon tate,
The Fearless Vampire Killers,
William Tennat
Birth of a Notion: Silly Little Game

Fantasy sports have been around for so long, and are now so prevalent, that it’s hard to remember a time when they weren’t woven into the fabric of sports fandom. These days some 30 million people participate in at least one fantasy sport, bolstering an industry that’s estimated to be worth as much as $4 billion annually. In 2010, fantasy sports don’t just honor their real-life inspirations, they help to keep them afloat, creating crucial (read: financial) bonds between fans and these games in an era when the multitude of alternate programming (more leagues, more teams, more TV shows, more websites, more pastimes, etc.) and the transient effect of free agency make it harder than ever to form a lasting, obsessive relationship with a hometown team. But this is a relatively new phenomenon. Prior to 1980, fantasy sports didn’t exist. And if it’s hard to imagine a time when fantasy sports weren’t played, it’s harder still – almost impossible – to imagine a time when fantasy sports weren’t even conceived. Like the wheel, the drum or the corndog, the fantasy sports model is one of those things that, once born, seems entirely self-evident; like electricity it was always there to be found. And yet even against a landscape of stats-based board games, the fantasy sports model wasn’t evident, indeed wasn’t found, until Dan Okrent had his moment of divine and dorky inspiration some 30 years ago.
Silly Little Game, the 11th installment in ESPN Films’ “30 for 30” series, is about that moment of inspiration and the avalanche of pseudo-sporting it accidentally brought to life. Directed by Adam Kurland and Lucas Jansen, the documentary puts the majority of its focus on fantasy sports’ infancy, when prior to the 1980 baseball season Okrent and his friends created something called Rotisserie Baseball, so named because they hatched it over lunch in a New York restaurant named La Rotisserie Francaise. Okrent and his friends created the league not to be famous, and certainly not to make money, but because they loved baseball and wanted a way “to possess it, to control it,” Okrent says. And so on April 13, 1980, these men, and one woman, who would later be called the “Founding Fathers” of fantasy sports, gathered together to hold the first fantasy baseball auction, aware of how many dollars they had to spend to fill out their rosters but utterly clueless to a player’s actual worth within their system. Philadelphia Phillies third baseman Mike Schmidt went for $26, for example, and it wasn’t until after the season that everyone realized he had a $40 value. New York Mets reliever Neil Allen, meanwhile, went for a seems-about-right $2 to a team that didn’t know a thing about him, only to have Allen’s breakout 22-save season catapult his owners to the first Rotisserie title, thus creating an “Oops” blueprint for success that would be copied – entirely unintentionally – for decades to come by millions of fantasy owners.
From that inaugural Rotisserie season, a tradition was born. And an obsession. Says Glen Waggoner, one of the Founding Fathers, “I thought it was a diversion. I didn’t know it was going to take over my life.” But that’s what happened. The original Rotisserie players lost themselves to the very things that attract people to fantasy sports today – the challenge and thrill of competition, the temptation of outsmarting one’s friends and so on. Of course, as the creators of the game, the original Rotisserie players also lost themselves to a certain level of stardom. There were interviews to give and, all too late, there were attempts to profit from their invention – books, shirts and even conventions. But their modest fame outlasted the even more modest fortune. Quickly, copycat leagues were created under the generic heading of “fantasy sports,” dropping “Rotisserie,” and the Founding Fathers lost their piece of the action. The craze spread from baseball to football to basketball and to every other conceivable sport. Fantasy sports spread so far, so quickly that somewhere along the way the origins of the craze became largely irrelevant, particularly to the generations too young to know where the name “Rotisserie” comes from, even if they’re cultured enough to recognize the now archaic fantasy term.
On this note, Silly Little Game looks to settle the score, to give credit where credit is due, to unearth the roots of fantasy sports. It does just that, quite often with humor and verve, thanks to interviews with Okrent, Waggoner, Lee Eisenberg and the other Founding Fathers (including Founding Mother, Valerie Salembier). That’s what’s great about the documentary. What’s not so great about it, however, is most everything else. Silly Little Game is rife with reenactments that aren’t just painfully cheesy but, even worse, entirely unnecessary. All too often, the film cuts from the already evocative descriptions from its interviewees to goofy dramatizations of their memories – on-the-nose reenactments in which the Founding Fathers are dressed in period attire from 1776 (the Founding Fathers, get it!?) or the early 1980s (big cellphones, big glasses, big sweaters). The result is a film that often looks like the bastard child of The Breakfast Club and Drunk History, Vol. 1, and that’s when it’s mediocre. At worst, the film comes off like a cheap parody of a parody – one degree removed from actually being funny. In these instances, the reenactments are either frighteningly lame, such as the handful of scenes in which the 1980s versions of the Founding Fathers sit in office furniture in the middle of a baseball field (really?), or they’re entirely tasteless, such as the moment when the fictional Neil Harris is handed a beer to chug as a reward for helping his fantasy team win the first Rotisserie title. That latter scene might seem innocuous, until you consider that Harris had his career thrown off track by a battle with alcoholism. Then it's not so funny.
These juvenile and just plain corny detours are the difference between Silly Little Game being a tremendous documentary and an often tedious one. Indeed, all that would need to be done to improve the film by half would be to cut nearly every reenactment and replace it with some run-of-the-mill B-roll of Major League action. That’s it. The Founding Fathers interviews are outstanding – thoughtful, intelligent and self-deprecating – but they nearly get lost in the shuffle. Also missed is the insight of a baseball traditionalist, thoughts from someone like Bob Costas, George Will or Peter Gammons on the impact of fantasy sports. Near the end of the documentary we do get a few seconds with Meat Loaf, who admits to having more than 40 fantasy football teams and almost 20 fantasy baseball teams, despite not knowing the origins of fantasy sports, but, well, so what? Is Meat Loaf considered a fantasy sports extremist among celebrities? His appearance is never put into context. It’s just another empty gag.
For these reasons, watching Silly Little Game can be as frustrating as owning Adam Dunn and Aramis Ramirez in a competitive NL-only keeper league and wondering how many weeks will go by until either guy reaches the Mendoza Line. Hypothetically speaking, of course. It’s not as if I truly identify with these tales of fantasy sports obsession. It’s not as if I know what it is to pore over box scores each morning, or to experience the thrill of a league championship or the humiliation of an auction day gaffe. (I mean, it’s not as if, prior to the 2008 season, Derek Lowe was going for $38, and I contemplated putting in a bid at $40, and then told myself I wouldn’t pay more than $45, and then uttered a bid of $50, not realizing what I’d said until I was hit in the face by the chilling sound of stunned silence. Nah, that’s never happened.) OK, so maybe I am one of them. Maybe I do indentify with their sports love and loserness. Maybe that’s why Silly Little Game at times has the nostalgia of old home-movies. And maybe that’s why I hate it when its reenactments waste so much of my time. After all, I’ve got to figure out how to win with a lineup in which Bengie Molina appears to be my offensive star. These silly little games are serious business.
Silly Little Game premieres tonight on ESPN at 8 pm ET, and will rerun frequently thereafter. The Cooler will be reviewing each film in the “30 for 30” series upon its release.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Sharon Tate Compared to Jean Harlow, Kerstien Matondang and New Video, Rare Sharon Photo, Sharon's Style and More on Polanski
I haven't done one of these for awhile so I thought I'd do another comparison article on Sharon and Jean Harlow:
Jean was born at 5: 40 pm-CST time while Sharon was born at 5:47 pm-CST time (close), but on a different date.
Both were part of the studio system and were designed to show off their sex appeal even though they really could act and do more if the role called for it.
Both were very close to their mothers who were in turn, very protective of their children. Their mothers were never the same after their children's deaths. In addition, both had their mother's laid to rest with them.
Both had kind natures and would give you the shirt off their backs if you needed it.
Both were generous to fans, happily signing autographs and answering fan mail--sending autographs.
Both worked for MGM and 20th Century Fox studios.
Harlow dated Max Baer, Sr while Sharon dated Max Baer, Jr though the second couple were actually more like good friends.
Other sex symbols/blonde bombshells have followed (including Sharon and Marilyn Monroe), but it is Jean Harlow who all others are measured against.
Both adored animals and had dogs.
Both were beautiful and married older men.
Both have been mentioned in song, for instance, Harlow was mentioned in Madonna's 'Vogue' song and Sharon was mentioned in The Aluminum Group song "Miss Tate." Others have mentioned them in their music as well.
Both starred in bit parts in movies eventually leading to larger roles.
Harlow's first film, "Hell's Angels" was shot twice. Once with another actress as a silent film, then with Harlow as a talkie film. Sharon had a similiar incident with her first major film when, Kim Novak backed out of filming "Eye of the Devil" and it had to be shot twice, the second time with Deborah Kerr in Novak's role.
Both displayed a talent for comedic performances and had a great sense of humor off camera as well.
Both were continuously on the ascendant in their careers, parts were starting to get better and show more range.
Neither wore underwear; Jean never did and Sharon stopped because she said Polanski didn't want the mark lines to appear on her beautiful body. In addition, both were photographed in the nude.
Both smoked, Harlow's brand was Fatima while Sharon preferred Tareyton.
Both also appeared in fashion magazines and were cover girls on many of them.
Both lived at a time at the Chateau Marmont, the famous Los Angeles Hotel. And both lived on Easton Drive in Benedict Canyon: this is where Harlow's husband Paul Bern committed suicide and years later, Jay Sebring bought the house and supposedly Sharon had a premonition there according to this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ow3uOnkwcg
Both died tragically at the age of 26 and were buried in California.
At the time of their deaths, everyone commented on how loved they were by so many and that neither had any enemies.
Do you have any to add? Feel free to comment.
Kerstien's new video is ready! Exciting! Here it is...
http://www.kerstien.se/sharoninart.htm
A rare lovely new photo of Sharon here:
http://rubenigga.tumblr.com/post/519070089/bohemea-sharon-tate
Sharon's style:
http://www.polyvore.com/sharon_tate/set?id=17972654
And can't Polanski have a nice afternoon with friends without being critized for it?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1267240/House-arrest-looked-better-Shamed-director-Roman-Polanski-enjoys-sunny-lunch-friends.html
Jean was born at 5: 40 pm-CST time while Sharon was born at 5:47 pm-CST time (close), but on a different date.
Both were part of the studio system and were designed to show off their sex appeal even though they really could act and do more if the role called for it.
Both were very close to their mothers who were in turn, very protective of their children. Their mothers were never the same after their children's deaths. In addition, both had their mother's laid to rest with them.
Both had kind natures and would give you the shirt off their backs if you needed it.
Both were generous to fans, happily signing autographs and answering fan mail--sending autographs.
Both worked for MGM and 20th Century Fox studios.
Harlow dated Max Baer, Sr while Sharon dated Max Baer, Jr though the second couple were actually more like good friends.
Other sex symbols/blonde bombshells have followed (including Sharon and Marilyn Monroe), but it is Jean Harlow who all others are measured against.
Both adored animals and had dogs.
Both were beautiful and married older men.
Both have been mentioned in song, for instance, Harlow was mentioned in Madonna's 'Vogue' song and Sharon was mentioned in The Aluminum Group song "Miss Tate." Others have mentioned them in their music as well.
Both starred in bit parts in movies eventually leading to larger roles.
Harlow's first film, "Hell's Angels" was shot twice. Once with another actress as a silent film, then with Harlow as a talkie film. Sharon had a similiar incident with her first major film when, Kim Novak backed out of filming "Eye of the Devil" and it had to be shot twice, the second time with Deborah Kerr in Novak's role.
Both displayed a talent for comedic performances and had a great sense of humor off camera as well.
Both were continuously on the ascendant in their careers, parts were starting to get better and show more range.
Neither wore underwear; Jean never did and Sharon stopped because she said Polanski didn't want the mark lines to appear on her beautiful body. In addition, both were photographed in the nude.
Both smoked, Harlow's brand was Fatima while Sharon preferred Tareyton.
Both also appeared in fashion magazines and were cover girls on many of them.
Both lived at a time at the Chateau Marmont, the famous Los Angeles Hotel. And both lived on Easton Drive in Benedict Canyon: this is where Harlow's husband Paul Bern committed suicide and years later, Jay Sebring bought the house and supposedly Sharon had a premonition there according to this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ow3uOnkwcg
Both died tragically at the age of 26 and were buried in California.
At the time of their deaths, everyone commented on how loved they were by so many and that neither had any enemies.
Do you have any to add? Feel free to comment.
Kerstien's new video is ready! Exciting! Here it is...
http://www.kerstien.se/sharoninart.htm
A rare lovely new photo of Sharon here:
http://rubenigga.tumblr.com/post/519070089/bohemea-sharon-tate
Sharon's style:
http://www.polyvore.com/sharon_tate/set?id=17972654
And can't Polanski have a nice afternoon with friends without being critized for it?
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Quote of the Week, New European Forum for Sharon, and How To Find Rare Sharon DVDs and More on Polanski
Here is our Quote of the Week:
From Leslie Caron:
"She was such a dear lovely girl,modest , sincere w/ a profound warmth. Blinding beauty and irresistable charm. She was also very sharp, an amazing precise, logical mind, not a fool, as some mistakenly felt, and she had alot of insight into what had happened to her. I adored her."
One of our contributors, Micaela has her own forum on Sharon now:
http://sharontate.forumfree.it/
Want to find Sharon's movies on DVD? Like "Eye of the Devil" and "12 + 1 Chairs":
http://modcinema.com/
Some Very Rare German Lobby Cards for "The Wrecking Crew":
http://cgi.ebay.de/WRECKING-CREW-Fotosatz-MATT-HELM-ROLLKOMMANDO-lobby-69_W0QQitemZ360252914822QQcmdZViewItemQQptZDE_Filme_DVD_s_TV_Fanartikel?hash=item53e0bf3c86
Polanski called a 'Master':
http://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/Movies/2010/04/18/Ghost-star-calls-Polanski-a-master/UPI-87871271584800/
And the victim has no say in current case?
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=10399823
From Leslie Caron:
"She was such a dear lovely girl,modest , sincere w/ a profound warmth. Blinding beauty and irresistable charm. She was also very sharp, an amazing precise, logical mind, not a fool, as some mistakenly felt, and she had alot of insight into what had happened to her. I adored her."
One of our contributors, Micaela has her own forum on Sharon now:
http://sharontate.forumfree.it/
Want to find Sharon's movies on DVD? Like "Eye of the Devil" and "12 + 1 Chairs":
http://modcinema.com/
http://cgi.ebay.de/WRECKING-CREW-Fotosatz-MATT-HELM-ROLLKOMMANDO-lobby-69_W0QQitemZ360252914822QQcmdZViewItemQQptZDE_Filme_DVD_s_TV_Fanartikel?hash=item53e0bf3c86
Polanski called a 'Master':
http://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/Movies/2010/04/18/Ghost-star-calls-Polanski-a-master/UPI-87871271584800/
And the victim has no say in current case?
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=10399823
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Photo Comparison of the Week, Sam Peckinpah and Polanski, Who Went to the Same High School as Sharon? A mention of Doris Tate and Emmanelle Seigner's Sexy Album
Here is our Photo Comparison of the Week:
A model who looks a bit like Sharon, especially the hair from "12 + 1":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N5_sdHzv0E
Thanks to Muriel for that one! ;)
Hope everyone is having a great weekend!
A model who looks a bit like Sharon, especially the hair from "12 + 1":
Apparently, Director Sam Peckinpah was upset about Sharon's death and even wrote a touching letter to Roman about it:

From our contributor Tammie, here is a web mention of Doris Tate:
And here is a great teaser video of Emmanuelle Seigner singing. Look at how much her style resembles Sharon, especially her clothes. I can see Sharon wearing these clothes and boots:

Thanks to Muriel for that one! ;)
Hope everyone is having a great weekend!
Friday, April 16, 2010
For Friday April 16, Photo of the Week, More New Books, New Vintage Translated Article: Sharon Tate and the "Hollywood Star System", A Dedication Video to Sharon and her baby, A Look Back at the Year 1969, End Game For Roman Polanski?
Sorry I got back a little late tonight...
Here is our lovely photo of the week:
Here are some items contributed by Sharon fan Micaela:
Two new Spanish books that mention Sharon:
And a new vintage translated article:
King Magazine Italy 1966
$500,000 for Sharon Tate
Now look at her, this is Sharon Tate, incredibly lovely, delightfully blonde and sure of herself. Ready to front the paths of the glory of celluloid.
Well, we must reveal to ourselves the secret: she is the classic product of the rigid "Hollywood Star System."
Sharon was, two years before, a simple lovely girl but no more.
Its luck is due to one man alone: of the noted Martin Ranshohoff, director of Filmways, a mass-producer of TV series.
Immediately Ransohoff put the young Tate under contract for seven years and spent $500,000 (that is 300 millions of lira--Italian money). For such a young lady Sharon began very hard work: lessons of song, dance, diction and performance.
When the $500,000 had been spent, from their ashes was born Sharon Tate, the star of tomorrow.
This is a Sharon that is beautiful everywhere and not afraid to show herself undressed.
In little time, we will see her in a film with Tony Curtis and Claudia Cardinale called "Don't Make Waves," a film tease of the crazy life in Southern California.
Many the shots here, all of our Sharon, show her in a small, colored bikini.
If you were to ask the young lady Tate today what was the thing that makes her laugh about her life, the sculptural girl answers without hesitation: "It was when, after seeing he had spent the $500,000, that Mr. Ransohoff had me do parts in five or six different series on TV with a black wig on." *Even though he had spent so much money on her she was still starring incognito.
After "Don't Make Waves", Sharon Tate is ready for the big producers.
At present, she just finished filming "The Fearless Vampire Killers," directed by the teacher of fear, Roman Polanski.
In the latest issue of Playboy and from the set of the film, Sharon Tate appears nude.
Thanks so much for these two items, Micaela!
Here is a lovely dedication to Sharon and her baby Paul:
http://inewmovie.com/11986/in-loving-memory-of-sharon-paul-richard/
A nice article on looking back at 1969:
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/1969-the-year-everything-changed-1752220.html
And an interesting new article on Roman Polanski:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/apr/15/roman-polanski-exile-ghost
Here is our lovely photo of the week:
From Photoplay magazine.
Here are some items contributed by Sharon fan Micaela:
Two new Spanish books that mention Sharon:
Polanski: Un Genio Maldito (This one is translated: Polanski: An Evil Genius).
Sangre en el Paraiso by Manuel Penella (Title translated: Blood in Paradise).
If anyone has read these please let us know what you think?
King Magazine Italy 1966
$500,000 for Sharon Tate
Now look at her, this is Sharon Tate, incredibly lovely, delightfully blonde and sure of herself. Ready to front the paths of the glory of celluloid.
Well, we must reveal to ourselves the secret: she is the classic product of the rigid "Hollywood Star System."
Sharon was, two years before, a simple lovely girl but no more.
Its luck is due to one man alone: of the noted Martin Ranshohoff, director of Filmways, a mass-producer of TV series.
Immediately Ransohoff put the young Tate under contract for seven years and spent $500,000 (that is 300 millions of lira--Italian money). For such a young lady Sharon began very hard work: lessons of song, dance, diction and performance.
When the $500,000 had been spent, from their ashes was born Sharon Tate, the star of tomorrow.
This is a Sharon that is beautiful everywhere and not afraid to show herself undressed.
In little time, we will see her in a film with Tony Curtis and Claudia Cardinale called "Don't Make Waves," a film tease of the crazy life in Southern California.
Many the shots here, all of our Sharon, show her in a small, colored bikini.
If you were to ask the young lady Tate today what was the thing that makes her laugh about her life, the sculptural girl answers without hesitation: "It was when, after seeing he had spent the $500,000, that Mr. Ransohoff had me do parts in five or six different series on TV with a black wig on." *Even though he had spent so much money on her she was still starring incognito.
After "Don't Make Waves", Sharon Tate is ready for the big producers.
At present, she just finished filming "The Fearless Vampire Killers," directed by the teacher of fear, Roman Polanski.
In the latest issue of Playboy and from the set of the film, Sharon Tate appears nude.
Thanks so much for these two items, Micaela!
Here is a lovely dedication to Sharon and her baby Paul:
http://inewmovie.com/11986/in-loving-memory-of-sharon-paul-richard/
Serge Gainsbourgh and Jane Birkin: One of the great 1960s couples.
A nice article on looking back at 1969:
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/1969-the-year-everything-changed-1752220.html
And an interesting new article on Roman Polanski:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/apr/15/roman-polanski-exile-ghost
Labels:
Claudia Cardinale,
Don't Make Waves,
Fearless Vampire Killers,
Jane Birkin,
Manuel Penella,
Martin Ransohoff,
Paul Polanski,
Playboy,
Roman Polanski,
Serge Gainsbourg,
sharon tate,
Tony Curtis
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Sharon Tate: Cinderella is a Colonel's Daughter and Another Part Sharon Would Have Been Good For...
I found this while going through some old Stars and Stripes Military Newspaper Archives:
The Stars and Stripes Sunday, January 1, 1967
Cinderella Is a Colonel's Daughter
By Harold Heffernan, NANA Staff Writer
Yes, Virginia, once there really was a Hollywood where magic happened almost every day. That was when the movies were young and romantic and their wide-eyed audiences would buy glamourized waitresses for goddesses, and fumbling producers lately come from the garment trade found themselves endowed with princely wealth--and power--overnight.
Now the movies are as cannily industralized as General Motors, and audiences are wiser, and between them they seem to have lost the magic somewhere along the way. Then comes a story that can almost make a fellow believe in Hollywood legend all over again.
The story, for instance, of Sharon Tate, the "instant star."
Sharon doesn't look like any waitress, but exactly like a princess--golden-haired, slim, and lovely, with wide-apart, believing eyes and a voice that makes her sound like she came right out of the blue. And, sure enough, she did!
Julie Newmar, co-starred with Tony Curtis and Claudia Cardinale in a movie called "Don't Make Waves," had suddenly bowed out of the cast for the oddest reason. She couldn't lift Tony Curtis. She'd been set to play "the Diana of Muscle Beach" in the story, but strained her back in a dance routine and withdrew. So, Producer Martin Ransohoff, in charge of the Filmways-MGM movie, announced he was flying Sharon Tate from London to take Julie's place.
And who, everyone wanted to know, might Sharon Tate be?
"I'm a girl," said Sharon, "who met Richard Beymer in Italy, where my father was stationed. He's an Army colonel. Richard was making a film, and I was 18. And he thought I could do something in pictures, so when we came back to America and settled in Los Angeles, he put me in touch with his agent.
"And I used to hitch-hike to the studios to try out for parts. One day I went by milk wagon to audition for a bit in 'Petticoat Junction,' the TV show, and well, I got it. But when they took me in to see Mr. Ransohoff, he said 'No.' He said, 'I'm going to make this girl a star,' and put me under long-term contract.
"But for 30 months nobody outside of Filmways knew I existed. I was told I was a secret. I was being taught speaking, walking, dancing, fencing, calisthenics, and, of course, acting. And sometimes Mr. Ransohoff would give me a TV bit, but always in a black wig and under another name.
"Finally, he said I was ready. So I was shipped off to London to co-star with David Niven and Deborah Kerr in '13' ."
What about the co-star arrangement? Here was a girl who'd never faced a movie camera before in her life, or even been billed on TV under her own name. She went from complete obscurity to star status overnight. And do you think she flopped? Not at all. Ransohoff liked her performance well enough to hand her the co-starring role in "The Vampire Killers," also made in London.
Then, with '13' and 'Vampire Killers' unreleased, and Sharon still totally unknown in the United States, our girl was brought home to replace Julie Newmar--and on a flying red carpet, with fanfare, a sure-enough Hollywood star the moment she touched ground.
"I'm a trick," Sharon laughed, explaining herself, "done with wigs, aliases, teachers, and, I guess, a lot of money."
Of course, she couldn't lift Curtis, either. That made no difference in her charmed life. The script somehow got rewritten so all she had to do was drag him up to the beach from the surf by the heels, and then the camera crew and the property department conspired to give her an unseen hand.
Magic and trickery, of course. But the main thing is that once more in a subdued Hollywood, Cinderella rides again!
Here is another blogger who says Sharon would have been better for a part in 1966 film "The Oscar" in the Elke Sommer role. She says:
Kay Berdahl could have been played by Sharon Tate. Kay needs to be beautiful yet vulnerable. Tate had that quality of being insecure and tender despite her gorgeous face and figure. Unfotunately, Kay was somewhat of a cold fish as played by Elke Sommer.
To see her other recasting pix for the film check here:
http://randomramblingofabroadwayfilmtvfan.blogspot.com/2010/04/do-you-ever-start-recasting-movie.html
So possibly that would have been another interesting part for Sharon ...
The Stars and Stripes Sunday, January 1, 1967
Cinderella Is a Colonel's Daughter
By Harold Heffernan, NANA Staff Writer
Yes, Virginia, once there really was a Hollywood where magic happened almost every day. That was when the movies were young and romantic and their wide-eyed audiences would buy glamourized waitresses for goddesses, and fumbling producers lately come from the garment trade found themselves endowed with princely wealth--and power--overnight.
Now the movies are as cannily industralized as General Motors, and audiences are wiser, and between them they seem to have lost the magic somewhere along the way. Then comes a story that can almost make a fellow believe in Hollywood legend all over again.
The story, for instance, of Sharon Tate, the "instant star."
Sharon doesn't look like any waitress, but exactly like a princess--golden-haired, slim, and lovely, with wide-apart, believing eyes and a voice that makes her sound like she came right out of the blue. And, sure enough, she did!
Julie Newmar, co-starred with Tony Curtis and Claudia Cardinale in a movie called "Don't Make Waves," had suddenly bowed out of the cast for the oddest reason. She couldn't lift Tony Curtis. She'd been set to play "the Diana of Muscle Beach" in the story, but strained her back in a dance routine and withdrew. So, Producer Martin Ransohoff, in charge of the Filmways-MGM movie, announced he was flying Sharon Tate from London to take Julie's place.
And who, everyone wanted to know, might Sharon Tate be?
"I'm a girl," said Sharon, "who met Richard Beymer in Italy, where my father was stationed. He's an Army colonel. Richard was making a film, and I was 18. And he thought I could do something in pictures, so when we came back to America and settled in Los Angeles, he put me in touch with his agent.
"And I used to hitch-hike to the studios to try out for parts. One day I went by milk wagon to audition for a bit in 'Petticoat Junction,' the TV show, and well, I got it. But when they took me in to see Mr. Ransohoff, he said 'No.' He said, 'I'm going to make this girl a star,' and put me under long-term contract.
"But for 30 months nobody outside of Filmways knew I existed. I was told I was a secret. I was being taught speaking, walking, dancing, fencing, calisthenics, and, of course, acting. And sometimes Mr. Ransohoff would give me a TV bit, but always in a black wig and under another name.
"Finally, he said I was ready. So I was shipped off to London to co-star with David Niven and Deborah Kerr in '13' ."
What about the co-star arrangement? Here was a girl who'd never faced a movie camera before in her life, or even been billed on TV under her own name. She went from complete obscurity to star status overnight. And do you think she flopped? Not at all. Ransohoff liked her performance well enough to hand her the co-starring role in "The Vampire Killers," also made in London.
Then, with '13' and 'Vampire Killers' unreleased, and Sharon still totally unknown in the United States, our girl was brought home to replace Julie Newmar--and on a flying red carpet, with fanfare, a sure-enough Hollywood star the moment she touched ground.
"I'm a trick," Sharon laughed, explaining herself, "done with wigs, aliases, teachers, and, I guess, a lot of money."
Of course, she couldn't lift Curtis, either. That made no difference in her charmed life. The script somehow got rewritten so all she had to do was drag him up to the beach from the surf by the heels, and then the camera crew and the property department conspired to give her an unseen hand.
Magic and trickery, of course. But the main thing is that once more in a subdued Hollywood, Cinderella rides again!
Here is another blogger who says Sharon would have been better for a part in 1966 film "The Oscar" in the Elke Sommer role. She says:
Kay Berdahl could have been played by Sharon Tate. Kay needs to be beautiful yet vulnerable. Tate had that quality of being insecure and tender despite her gorgeous face and figure. Unfotunately, Kay was somewhat of a cold fish as played by Elke Sommer.
To see her other recasting pix for the film check here:
http://randomramblingofabroadwayfilmtvfan.blogspot.com/2010/04/do-you-ever-start-recasting-movie.html
So possibly that would have been another interesting part for Sharon ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)