Monday, August 10, 2009

Another Possible Film Sharon was an Extra in?


I found an article on Jozy Pollock. Jozy became the British “Hula-Hoop Queen” in her youth, then married American magician Channing Pollock and moved to the United States, where they performed on the Ed Sullivan Show. Then the two of them went on the road with the flamboyant pianist Liberace. Later, she divorced Pollock.


“I knew Sharon Tate when she was a teenager,” said Jozy, who is now a prison chaplain. “I met her in Italy where my husband was making films and she was an extra in one of them. When she came to Los Angeles we used to hang out."

Sharon an extra in one of Pollock's films? I had to look this up on the Imdb and see what Channing Pollock had made during that time:

If she was in Italy between 1961 and 1962 the film would have to be:

Lo sceicco rosso (1963) .... Ruiz/The Red Sheik
... aka Le cheik rouge (France)
... aka The Red Sheik

The only other films Channing Pollock made before that time were released in 1959 and 1960.

We know Sharon was an extra in Barabbas and, even though we cannot find her, she was supposedly in Hemmingway's Adventures of a Young Man.

So here is another film to look for Sharon in but, it may be like the Hemmingway film and we cannot find her. It's worth seeing and trying though.

I heard she was an extra in films while in Italy but her biographies only list 2 films. I've always thought that surely she was in more than those 2. Maybe others as well. Of course, she was also on a Pat Boone special at the time.

If anyone sees The Red Sheik, let me know if you find Sharon? Or if anyone has any comments please feel free to leave them.

Sunday, August 9, 2009

RIP to the victims...




Just wanted to leave note to Rest in Peace for the victims of the murders on August 9, 1969.


Sharon Tate (along with her baby, Paul Richard Polanski)


Jay Sebring

Abigail Folger

Voytech Frykowski

Steve Parent













Saturday, August 8, 2009

A New Positive Article on Sharon!



I saw this article this morning and wanted to share it with you:

Los Angeles Times, August 9, 2009

Restoring Sharon Tate

Associated Press’60s STYLE: Sharon Tate’s fashion sense and personality continue to inspire designers. She’s shown in 1968, a year before her death.
'ICON: Life Style Love Sharon Tate' celebrates the actress as 'a style icon, not a tragic headline,' according to artist Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell.

By Steffie Nelson

Her closet may have been full of designer dresses, but Sharon Tate was a flower child all the way down to her toes. Most comfortable barefoot, she used to skirt the "shoes required" laws in snooty late '60s Beverly Hills by looping leather string around her toes and across the tops of her feet, and then tying the ends around her ankles. Voila: sandals. Even the Malibu Barbie doll, said to be inspired by the actress and her bikini-clad character, Malibu, from the 1967 beach comedy "Don't Make Waves," was barefoot in her box.

Details like these seem trivial when held up against the events of Aug. 9, 1969, when Tate, 26 years old and eight months pregnant with her husband Roman Polanski's child, was murdered by Charles Manson's followers in her Benedict Canyon home. Indeed, it's difficult to utter Tate's name without Manson's following close behind, and it will be even more so on this 40th anniversary weekend, as the face of the cult leader, now 74, looms large in the media.

Is it possible to remember her now as the free-spirited natural beauty who prided herself on wearing the shortest miniskirts in town, instead of as the victim of a horrific crime? Santa Monica artist Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell is attempting to tease apart the intertwined images with the exhibition "ICON: Life Style Love Sharon Tate," which celebrates, in his words, "a style icon, not a tragic headline." Taking over an 8,000-square-foot space in Culver City this weekend, the multimedia show expands upon a series of photographs Corbell shot last year of up-and-comer Lauren Hastings modeling pieces from Tate's wardrobe.

The clothes came courtesy of Tate's sister Debra, who shared them with the public for the first time on a 2008 episode of "Inside Edition." "No one ever really, in her opinion, cared to know about this other part of [Sharon's] life, her passion for clothing and her sense of style," explains the program's producer Esmeralda Servin, who had come to know Debra, now 56, through other stories (most related to Manson family parole hearings). Debra, she says, was immediately receptive to the idea of focusing on the clothes, with Servin and in the Corbell project that flowed from it.

For the cameras, Debra pulled plastic-wrapped pieces from a cedar hope chest, including the high-necked, puff-sleeved, micro-mini wedding dress that Sharon designed for her 1968 marriage to Polanski. News footage from the couple's reception at the Playboy Club in London -- attended by L.A. pals including Warren Beatty, Candice Bergen, Mia Farrow and many others -- shows them looking like some kind of mod fairy-tale prince and princess; the diminutive auteur (only 5 foot 5 to her 5 foot 6) in a frock coat and cravat, feeding cake to his bride, fresh white flowers woven into her elaborate do. Her beauty -- which her husband claimed she was "embarrassed by" -- is timeless, yet she effortlessly embodied her time: glamorous starlet in heavy false eyelashes and fur one moment, haute hippie with beach-blond hair and languid gaze the next.

It's that image that still resonates powerfully in the design world, where, at least in some quarters, she seems to survive in memory more as muse than martyr. "It wasn't only her looks, it was the way she carried herself," says Dear Creatures' Bianca Benitez, who invokes the "Valley of the Dolls" ingenue in her spring 2009 collection. There's even a pair of high-waisted denim "Sharon Shorts," although Tate herself was partial to dresses.

Each piece worn by Hastings captures a different side of Tate, and of the '60s: There's a short, black mink coat with the name "Sharon Tate" embroidered inside; an Ossie Clark tunic worn with an op-art Yves Saint Laurent scarf; a full-sleeved paisley minidress by British hippie chic designer Thea Porter (who famously put Talitha Getty in a caftan); the black lace, strapless Christian Dior gown Tate wore to the premiere of "Rosemary's Baby"; and the simple, flowered sundresses she wore around the house that fateful summer at 10050 Cielo Drive.

Resurrection Vintage owner and designer Katy Rodriguez, who lives nearby, has visited that address "many times." "She is a huge inspiration to me," says the designer, who has played with '60s silhouettes in several collections. "She is the ultimate L.A. woman. There is no other."

Rodriguez tells a story about visiting her friend Nils Stevenson in London. "He was the Sex Pistols' PR person in the '70s and his brother is the rock photographer Ray Stevenson. Nils had a black-and-white image that Ray shot of Sharon at a party in the '60s. She looked so glamorous in something shimmery with that big hair. We had more than a few drunken nights staring at the photo and saying the same thing: They just don't make girls like that anymore. Everyone loved her, even the punks."

Undeniably, the darkness of Tate's fate somehow throws her into brighter relief. But, Rodriguez asserts, "The Manson connection is only one part of her story. Her life and her promise was as compelling as her death. She traveled between light and dark. . . . It's what makes her so interesting. Other people died that night, but we gravitate toward Sharon."

Tate's path certainly didn't follow the storybook fantasy of her wedding. By 1969 she was considering divorcing the womanizing Polanski, according to author Greg King, and lamented the direction her film career had taken. To her friends, Sharon disparaged her media image as "sexy little me."

"She did these movies that critics like Pauline Kael and others made fun of," notes Adam Parfrey, a book publisher whose catalog encompasses Hollywood history as well as the Manson Family. "She wasn't a star; she was a starlet. She never had a chance to demonstrate much acting prowess."

Star billing came only after her death, when "Valley of the Dolls" and the Polanski-directed horror spoof "The Fearless Vampire Killers" were rereleased within days of the murders, preserving her image in the bloom of youth and possibility.

Corbell spent more than a year pondering Tate's story as he reworked the photographs he'd shot with an old press Polaroid camera: enlarging them, painting on them, and embedding them in antique window frames. He believes our fascination goes deep, to a subconscious level. "Is she an icon just because of her death," he asks, "or is she an icon because she represented something -- some spirit of purity or love -- that was brought to light by the way she died?"

The 32-year-old, self-described "accidental artist" freely admits that when he was first approached by Servin about doing the shoot, he found the concept a little creepy. "I made that same equation, Sharon = Manson." But as he grew to understand Debra Tate's situation -- robbed of almost every positive memory of her sister -- Corbell "saw the potential to tell a story that was bigger. That's what I care about as an artist."

Asked why he chose the anniversary of Tate's death to celebrate her life, Corbell says that he'd actually considered having the show on her birthday, "but what I'm trying to do is change the equation on a day that acts as this launchpad to repeat the negative mantra of fear. I'm trying to turn fear into hope."

ICON is open to the public from 1 to 5 p.m. today at High Profile Productions, 5896 Smiley Drive, Culver City.

Please join me in emailing the writer of this article and thanking her for sharing this with us: steffien@earthlink.net .

Falling Out of Love at the Movies


It was Say Anything that taught me that stalking a woman could be romantic, and it was Nine and 1/2 Weeks that taught me that the refrigerator is an erotic treasure chest and it was Jerry Maguire that taught me that you can get the pretty girl just by saying “Hello” (which is damn convenient when talking longer would only reveal that you’re a soulless prick who is so clueless about love that your attempts at sincerity require you to recycle lines you stole from a deaf guy in an elevator, but never mind). But when I tell you that every serious relationship I’ve ever had has been influenced by the movies, I’m not referring to those onscreen lessons in romance. Instead I’m talking about what happens offscreen, when by discussing a movie over dinner one falls in love with the person across the table. It’s happened to me a few times. Discussing movies has a wonderful way of revealing someone’s interests, passions and even morals. It’s a great way to figure out what someone is all about. Of course, what one finds behind the curtain isn’t always pleasant.

If one can fall in love talking about movies, one can certainly fall out of love that way, too. Just ask Craig from The Man From Porlock. This week in the comments section of the latest edition of The Conversations over at The House Next Door, Craig added this anecdote to some philosophizing on Michael Mann: “I wish I didn't have the memory of taking a date to see Last of the Mohicans upon its original release, and listening to her spend the rest of the evening complaining that Daniel Day-Lewis didn't look like a Mohican.” Indeed. Over the years, I’ve been in love with women who adored movies that I hated (and vice versa), and I’ve fallen for women who thought my affection for cinema is, you know, maybe a little excessive. But complaining that Day-Lewis isn’t Mohican enough (when the film makes it clear that his Hawkeye is English by birth)? Well, you’ve got to draw the line somewhere.

So, in honor of Craig, here’s a random list of 13 unlucky movie-related comments that would stop a relationship in its tracks*:

1) “When did Al Pacino become so understated?”

2) “I can’t believe The Lord of the Rings movies won only 17 Oscars!”

3) “When is someone going to remake Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid with Nicolas Cage and Keanu Reeves?”

4) “M Night Shyamalan just keeps getting better.”

5) “It’s such bullshit that these Saw movies come out only once a year.”

6) “I might have liked The Man Who Wasn’t There … if it had been in color!”

7) “Tony Leung is okay, I guess. But he’ll never be as good of an actor as that Asian dude who played the landlord in Breakfast at Tiffany’s.”

8) “I know who could have made No Country For Old Men interesting. Paul Greengrass!”

9) “I wish that Quidditch scene would have gone on longer.”

10) “I always wanted a Matrix-themed wedding.”

11) “Kevin Costner’s accent was sooooo gooooood!”

12) “Hitchcock sucks.”

13) “You know who you look like? John Merrick from … what was that movie called?”

*All these things would be perfectly acceptable, of course, if the woman uttering them was Diane Lane. Just saying.

OK, movie lovers and lovers at movies: now I want your list. Make your entries in the comments section, or you can consider this post an unofficial meme and give a link back to The Cooler. Bonus points if you can use any real lines from your dating history.

Friday, August 7, 2009

Model Milla Jovovich picks a Tate like wedding dress



Congratulations are in order for Milla Jovovich, who confirmed that she and fiancé, director Paul Anderson, will tie the knot Aug. 22 at their Hollywood home.

"We're getting married in two weeks!" she gushed at the premiere of her latest thriller A Perfect Getaway, which costars Steve Zahn and Timothy Olyphant and hits theatres nationwide Friday. "So, that's just one more kind of layer on my proverbial cake."

Carmen Hawk will be designing her dress for the special day. "I'm making a dress right now," she revealed. "It's very like, without the negative influence, but it's very like Sharon Tate kind of 1960's mini-dress."

As I have been discussing on this blog, Sharon is still influencing style today.

Thursday, August 6, 2009

"(Sharon) chose me." ICON Exhibit




Got this in an email today:

JEREMY KENYON LOCKYER CORBELL’S mixed media art series- ICON: THE LIFE & STYLE OF SHARON TATE: ICON is a three day mixed media exhibition honoring the life and style of Sharon Tate on the 40th anniversary of her passing. The exhibition featuring Corbell’s new work will be held at High Profile Productions in Culver City. This art & fashion based event will showcase the never before revealed wardrobe of the late Sharon Tate. Watch the ICON teaser here: www.jeremycorbell.com .



Corbell’s ICON mixed media art exhibition will include:
- Unique mixed media prints embedded in windows from the 1960’s
- One of a kind large format media prints
- Mixed media canvas works
- Polaroid darkroom installation
- Video installations
- Limited edition and signed books
- Limited edition and signed canvas posters
- Limited edition ICON apparel
- ICON documentary pre-premiere teaser
- Live polaroid photo shoot
- Sharon Tate Shrine

(Sounds interesting, wish I could go...)

There was also a short interview with the artist:

QUESTION: Tell us about the upcoming ICON exhibit?

ICON is my latest creation. I have created a huge body of mixed media work for it. For the last year and a half I have been building this series which will premiere this August in Culver City. It was my intension to make my art accessible to everybody. In this series I believe I have succeeded. Every person will be able to walk away a collector after the opening. I think it is going to blow peoples minds.

QUESTION: Why did you choose Sharon Tate?

She chose me. The idea of shooting Sharon’s wardrobe was brought to me by a friend, and then after meeting Debra Tate (Sharon’s sister), everything just made sense and I realized the importance of the story
I could tell through my art. What was appealing about the project was how my perception instantly changed once I did a little research. I initially equated (as everybody does) SHARON TATE = CHARLES MANSON. After some research I became mystified by the fear and paranoia surrounding Sharon’s tragic death. I realized that within that fear was an opportunity, as FEAR is simply an expectation of the future… exactly the same as HOPE. They are both expectations you see… on opposite sides of the spectrum. One is positive and one is negative… most importantly is the fact that perception is a simple choice. I figured that within Sharon’s spirit there must be something captivating… something pure and beautiful. This is the only way such fear and mental chaos could emerge in our consciousness from her death. There has been a polarity going on here. I choose to discover the truth within the untruth, the light within the dark, and the life within the death. This is why Sharon’s spirit began to fascinate me. This is why our reaction to her fascinates me. Is Sharon only an ICON because of her death? Or did her death reveal a principle of her spirit that we all can identify with. Did her death just clarify who she was and what she meant in life. There is something in this that we all relate to…even if it is just the acknowledgment of fear.

It is my aim to move from a consciousness of fear to hope. To discover not only who Sharon was in LIFE, STYLE and LOVE; but also to understand what it was about her extraordinary spirit that symbolized our hopes and dreams as a culture then, and how it relates to us today.



QUESTION: Do you have a personal favorite Sharon Tate movie moment or even
fashion moment in her real life (For instance I like the part in Valley of the Dolls when Jennifer (played by Sharon Tate) is forced to travel to Paris to work in “Art Films” to help pay for Tony’s medical bills)?


I learned a lot from the way Sharon moved. Rather than her theatrical movies (because she is acting) I prefer to watch her home videos. This is what I did in research for my series ICON. I looped about 2
hours of her silent home videos and projected them on a wall. I just watched her on the phone, talking, laughing and walking. This allowed me to read between the lines. The moments when she didn’t know the camera was on her, or she just forgot… those were the most interesting and beautiful. She was simply captivating. She seemed pure, innocent and radiant. Just as everybody has described her.

Other than that her wedding dress was pretty amazing. She got married in this cute little miniskirt of a wedding dress… that was pretty radical especially for the time. The only thing cooler I can imagine is if she was 8 and 1/2 months pregnant and in the miniskirt wedding dress. That is how I want my wedding to be. Sharon’s sister told me that Sharon used to wear leather straps around her ankles and big toes so people would think she was wearing sandals. This way she could go barefoot just about anywhere. She had her own style… and I respect that. She seemed to have a radical freedom of mind that others fear texplore…same with her husband Roman Polanski.

This is exactly what I've been discussing in this blog. Sharon Tate = Manson ? That needs to change!

I read someone else's blog yesterday and I agree completely with dcornelius (from http://dcornelius-babylon.blogspot.com/2009/08/sharon-tate.html) :

Sharon Tate was a rising star in Hollywood. She was married to Roman Polanski, who she met when he directed her in The Fearless Vampire Killers. She was nominated for a Golden Globe for her role in Valley of the Dolls. She was a 60's symbol of beauty and sexuality. On 9 August 1969, forty years ago next Sunday, she, along with four other people - close friends who were at the house that night while Polanski was away in London - was murdered in her home by the followers of Charles Manson. She was stabbed sixteen times. She was eight and a half months pregnant. Her murder, I think, closed the 60's and brought us the 70's.

I tend to crawl through the internet, picking things up and poking at others, until something explodes in front of me and spiral through link after link until a full picture - sometimes wondrous, other times horrifying - rises up. I knew about the Tate and LaBianca killings and the Manson family's murderous rampage, of course. Who doesn't? But it was only recently, as I was researching a few things for a short story I am writing, that I followed an incredibily convoluted trail of links and the Sharon Tate story opened up to me, and then I spent the evening stunned almost to tears by what I was reading. She was pregnant. She was 26. She was gorgeous. She was lovely and loved. And they destroyed her.

I don't want to treat her as a symbol. I want to preserve her humanity. But if anyone's death symbolizes the senselessness and the injustices that so often torment this mortal shuffle, it may be Sharon Tate's.



In these images she looks nearly immortal. There are crime scene and coroner's photographs on the internet. I found some of them. I won't post them or encourage finding them for yourself. Beauty can be destroyed - viciously, senselessly, and without mercy. It can be left broken. It is the task of the living to preserve the beautiful, however... not to shrink from evil but to stand against it. And so I stand and celebrate beauty.

That is the way I see it also. Lets celebrate Sharon as an Icon; of beauty, fashion, life, and love. I think that is the way she would want it.

Notebook: Whatever & Twitter


Whatever Works
Woody Allen’s Whatever Works, which I only recently got around to seeing, doesn’t offer much to get excited about. With its (occasional) sharp wit injected into a plot about a cantankerous old guy whining about life in the presence of a beautiful much younger woman, it is dependably Woodman. And, as such, it’s pretty boringly Woodman, too. Its humor and themes are almost tediously familiar. But then so are these criticisms. So rather than continue the annual reassessment of Allen’s career, let me take a moment to mention what I found to be the film’s greatest weakness and greatest strength.

The weakness is Larry David. And, paradoxically, the problem with Larry David is that he’s too strong. Too tall, too vital, too menacing, too consequential. His Boris Yellnikoff rants and cracks wise like the typical Woody Allen lead. He’s familiarly neurotic and opinionated. He’s typically inflexible. But for all the ways David seems like a natural to fill Allen’s shoes, the fact remains that his feet are too big. Boris isn’t small, meek and unintimidating. He isn’t so awkward that he’s endearing. He doesn’t seem jaded but ultimately harmless. To the contrary, Boris packs a wallop. To Alvy Singer’s ankle-biter, Boris is a Rottweiler who might have rabies. When he barks, we pay attention. After spending 15 minutes listening to Boris growling, I was ready to call animal control. Even at their worst, Allen’s incarnations – like the Seinfeld cast, actually – are fun to be around. Boris is just a jerk who makes time in his presence a chore.

And that’s what makes Evan Rachel Wood’s performance, the film’s greatest asset, all the more remarkable. She plays Melodie St. Ann Celestine, a character even more preposterous than her name. Melodie is capital-S Southern and Stupid. The notion that she would be attracted to Boris, and he to her, is as ridiculous as … as … well, as about any of the hookups that Allen-played characters have had over the past 20 years. But, wouldn’t you know it, Wood finds a way to make it all seem plausible (or as plausible as the film requires). She embraces Melodie’s twangy accent and ditsy personality and plays them surprisingly straight. Melodie is a cartoon character, yes, but Wood’s performance isn’t cartoonish. (What’s the difference? Think of a scenery-chewing performance by Bette Midler. That’s the difference.) This isn’t the first time I’ve enjoyed Wood. She impressed me in Thirteen, Down in the Valley, Running With Scissors and The Wrestler, to name a few. But, one way or another, all of that is pretty dark material. It’s refreshing to see Wood play a character who is so light and loveable. Her portrayal in Whatever Works joins Maya Rudolph’s turn in Away We Go among the most impressive female performances unlikely to get a sniff of year-end awards hype. Too bad.



Twitter
The Cooler is now on Twitter. How long that will last, we’ll see. If you’d like to follow movie-related tweets from this twit, just go to twitter.com/coolercinema. If not, no problem. If you’re not down with Twitter, I’m not here to convert you. (I’m hardly its biggest champion.) I’ve decided to experiment with the annoyingly popular social media tool for two reasons: first, to have further interaction with other movie fans at a more immediate (and, yes, micro) level; second, to create another way to perhaps expand The Cooler’s audience. CoolerCinema tweets won’t be anything earth shattering, believe me. Mostly I’ll be using Twitter to link to articles when I post them (if you’re a regular visitor to The Cooler or use RSS to stay in touch, this won’t help you). I’ll also toss off pithy observations on movies – the kind of stuff you might find in the Etcetera section below – when the mood strikes. Just to be clear, the Twitter feed is secondary to (and hopefully supportive of) this blog. I simply want to make it easier for readers to stay in touch given my irregular posting schedule. (Note to Twitter virgins: You don't need to have tweets sent to your phone to be involved on Twitter. You can do it all online. You can even follow tweets through your RSS reader, if you'd prefer.)

Another step I've taken to make it easier to keep in touch with The Cooler is adding Blogger’s follower feature to the sidebar. It’s a move I’d resisted up to this point because, frankly, I thought it was going to be a fast-dying fad. I was wrong. My impression is that its popularity is growing – I use Google Reader myself, and it saves me hours of time each week. So, if you’d like, become a follower of The Cooler.



Etcetera (aka Tweet-type Stuff)
Here’s how enchanting I find Rachel McAdams: Whenever I see trailers for The Time Traveler’s Wife, I try to convince myself that it looks really, really good. … Leave it to Matt Zoller Seitz to write what I think might be the line of the year. It comes in his review of the latest Harry Potter film. Give it a read and look out for his parenthetical reference to one of the movie’s early scenes. Matt coins a term so slyly clever that at first I doubted its intent. I’m still chuckling. … In other good writing news, Will Pfeifer nails the absurdity of Steven Spielberg’s rumored remake of Harvey. I listed the link in my Sharin’ the Love section, but it was worth an additional plug. … I had to laugh the other day when, flipping through TV, I pulled up the guide for the five or so Encore channels that I get as part of my rather modest Comcast package. Listed in order were the following films: Missionary Man, Odd Man Out and Toy Soldiers. For a moment I thought it was a roundup of Best Picture nominees for the AVN Awards. ... A plug for Tony Dayoub's De Palma Blog-a-thon coming up in September.